Log of the #fcrepo channel on chat.freenode.net

Using timezone: Eastern Standard Time
* dbernstein leaves01:44
* coblej joins08:18
* coblej leaves08:22
* dwilcox joins08:24
* awoods joins08:28
* dhlamb_ joins08:37
* benpennell joins08:53
* whikloj joins08:57
* peichman joins09:16
* yamil joins09:17
* bseeger joins09:50
* benpennell leaves10:05
* benpennell joins10:18
* benpennell leaves10:48
* jcreel joins10:55
* dbernstein joins10:57
* benpennell joins10:58
* escowles joins10:59
* apb18 joins
* westgard joins11:02
<escowles>sounds like background noise to me, too11:03
<peichman>is someone calling in from an aquarium?
<escowles>it reminds me of a didgeridoo performance i once heard11:04
* yinlin joins
<bseeger>related, duplicate bug: https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-257311:07
* whikloj coming in late
* bryjbrown joins11:20
<whikloj>Are we pulling forward transactions? Have we decided how that would look?11:23
<escowles>whikloj: we haven't decided
<whikloj>escowles: ok cool, thanks
<bseeger>apb18 - sounds distant again - is it just my connection?11:24
<awoods>is it just me? or is apb18 hard to understand?
<escowles>but i don't think we've decided to remove them from modeshape impl either...
<peichman>whikloj: https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification-atomic-operations
<escowles>yeah, i can't follow the thread
<benpennell>sounds like his audio is getting garbled
<apb18>escowles: Thanks that is a summary of what I was trying to say. Am going to hang up and dial from land line11:26
<whikloj>apb18: good point
<bseeger>I'm on the same page with everyone so far. Another consideration about logisitics - do we have enough developer effort to create and then maintain this in the short term?
<escowles>bseeger: i think that's a good point — lets get the api spec implemented and see if we have the time and resources to do this11:28
I really like the idea of always having the latest snapshots in sonatype11:31
* mcritchlow joins11:32
<awoods>apb18: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1I_zTMxh2l2rf2wpafoTwhSTR5GZuEoaTcZmTKCI3xT4/edit?usp=sharing11:33
<whikloj>awoods: I can do the content-length, I did look at it. My apologizes, but you are out of date. https://github.com/fcrepo4/fcrepo4/pull/121311:38
<escowles>whikloj: i can give you a donut if you come to #c4l1811:40
* bryjbrown leaves11:57
<escowles>notes are updated in the meeting page12:01
whikloj: I have updated: https://github.com/fcrepo4/fcrepo4/pull/121312:18
<whikloj>awoods: cool, i'll pull it down now
* bseeger leaves12:28
* westgard leaves12:31
* travis-ci joins12:35
awoods/fcrepo4#10 (fcrepo-2536-4.7-maint - 5447dca : Esmé Cowles): The build passed.
Change view : https://github.com/awoods/fcrepo4/compare/78ba100a5e1a...5447dca758bb
Build details : https://travis-ci.org/awoods/fcrepo4/builds/270486677
* travis-ci leaves
* dwilcox leaves12:43
<whikloj>awoods: possibly not an issue and I guess tied in to the general HEAD and Content-Length issues, but this fix does not affect HEAD requests. Is that because of https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-2248
* github-ff joins12:45
[fcrepo4] whikloj pushed 2 new commits to 4.7-maintenance: https://git.io/v58g6
fcrepo4/4.7-maintenance 5447dca Esmé Cowles: Using range length for content-length header
fcrepo4/4.7-maintenance e279185 Jared Whiklo: Merge pull request #1213 from awoods/fcrepo-2536-4.7-maint...
* github-ff leaves
<awoods>whikloj: I am giving it a look12:51
<whikloj>awoods: no worries, in a HEAD request it gives the full size. Which could be fine, not sure why you would do a HEAD request with a range. But I just tried it.12:52
* github-ff joins12:53
[fcrepo4] escowles created 4.7-maintenance-user-ns-backport (+1 new commit): https://git.io/v58aE
fcrepo4/4.7-maintenance-user-ns-backport babdb51 Esmé Cowles: User-supplied namespace prefixes (#1195)...
* github-ff leaves
<awoods>whikloj: what are the exact differences you are seeing between the headers on GET and HEAD of a binary?
<whikloj>awoods: https://gist.github.com/whikloj/732e03023c1e453c409b6fa33a16e4a512:54
* github-ff joins12:55
[fcrepo4] escowles opened pull request #1221: User-supplied namespace prefixes (#1195) (4.7-maintenance...4.7-maintenance-user-ns-backport) https://git.io/v58aQ
* github-ff leaves
* github-ff joins12:56
[fcrepo4] escowles pushed 1 new commit to 4.7-maintenance-user-ns-backport: https://git.io/v58aF
fcrepo4/4.7-maintenance-user-ns-backport 52a541c Esmé Cowles: Merge branch '4.7-maintenance' into 4.7-maintenance-user-ns-backport
* github-ff leaves
<whikloj>awoods: oh forget it
<awoods>whikloj: really?
whikloj: I was about to suggest creating a new ticket.
<whikloj>awoods: yeah I just did some reading and rfc7233 says
"A server MUST ignore a Range header field received with a request method other than GET."12:57
awoods: sorry about that, I should have checked first
<awoods>whikloj: thank you for checking at all :)
* travis-ci joins13:00
fcrepo4/fcrepo4#5096 (4.7-maintenance - e279185 : Jared Whiklo): The build passed.
Change view : https://github.com/fcrepo4/fcrepo4/compare/2ec5d465cea4...e27918580ae6
Build details : https://travis-ci.org/fcrepo4/fcrepo4/builds/270497541
* travis-ci leaves
* travis-ci joins13:09
fcrepo4/fcrepo4#5097 (4.7-maintenance-user-ns-backport - babdb51 : Esmé Cowles): The build passed.
Change view : https://github.com/fcrepo4/fcrepo4/commit/babdb51b664d
Build details : https://travis-ci.org/fcrepo4/fcrepo4/builds/270499955
* travis-ci leaves
* travis-ci joins13:11
fcrepo4/fcrepo4#5099 (4.7-maintenance-user-ns-backport - 52a541c : Esmé Cowles): The build passed.
Change view : https://github.com/fcrepo4/fcrepo4/compare/babdb51b664d...52a541c5f2bb
Build details : https://travis-ci.org/fcrepo4/fcrepo4/builds/270500790
* travis-ci leaves
* dwilcox joins13:14
* escowles leaves13:35
* bseeger joins13:36
* bryjbrown joins13:38
* yinlin_ joins13:42
* mcritchlow leaves
* yinlin leaves13:43
<awoods>apb18: I am rebasing https://github.com/fcrepo4/fcrepo4/pull/1220 on 4.7-maintenance since it now has a conflict.
<apb18>awoods: Sounds good. Also, discovered another mixed content issue, in the form that submits to fcr:tx13:45
<awoods>apb18: Would you mind creating a follow-on ticket for the issue you discovered?13:46
<apb18>Yeah, wil do that13:47
<awoods>apb18: it would be nice to keep symmetry between commits going into master and 4.7-maintenance.
<apb18>Yes, merge since its twin is already in master13:48
<awoods>apb18: would you mind merging PR-1220... since I already have fingerprints on it.13:51
<apb18>Yes, I plan to do so13:52
* apb18_ joins14:00
* apb18 leaves14:02
* github-ff joins14:05
[fcrepo4] birkland closed pull request #1220: Add root path to velocity context (4.7-maintenance...fcrepo-2534-4.7-maint) https://git.io/v5JDt
* github-ff leaves
* bryjbrown leaves14:39
* bryjbrown joins
* jcreel leaves14:46
* bseeger leaves14:59
* bseeger joins15:02
* bryjbrown_ joins15:16
* ksclarke joins15:18
* bryjbrown leaves
* bseeger leaves15:23
* bseeger joins15:24
* mcritchlow joins15:26
* apb18_ leaves
* bseeger leaves16:02
* bryjbrown_ leaves16:11
* bryjbrown_ joins16:13
* benpennell leaves16:14
* dwilcox leaves16:17
* bseeger joins16:18
* bryjbrown_ leaves16:35
* github-ff joins16:46
[fcrepo-specification] zimeon opened pull request #201: Add note about acl:default instead of obsolete acl:defaultForNew (master...issue-164) https://git.io/v54Jg
* github-ff leaves
* peichman leaves17:04
* whikloj leaves17:11
* bseeger leaves17:13
* benpennell joins17:21
* yamil leaves17:50
* mcritchlow leaves18:02
* dhlamb_ leaves18:05
* benpennell leaves18:22
* ksclarke leaves19:11
* apb18_ joins20:20
* apb18_ leaves20:26
* benpennell joins20:32
* yinlin_ leaves22:15
* apb18_ joins22:17
* yinlin joins22:19
* benpennell leaves
* dhlamb_ joins22:32
* awoods leaves22:52
* dbernstein leaves23:39
* apb18_ leaves00:09
* dhlamb_ leaves01:02