Log of the #fcrepo channel on chat.freenode.net

Using timezone: Eastern Standard Time
* manojgautam leaves01:18
* manojgautam joins01:37
* escowles_ joins02:20
* escowles leaves02:23
* jonathangee leaves05:29
* jonathangee joins05:41
* escowles_ leaves07:25
* manojgautam leaves07:30
* dhlamb joins08:10
* escowles joins08:11
* escowles leaves08:13
* escowles joins08:38
* escowles leaves08:42
* acoburn joins09:14
* bseeger joins09:23
<acoburn>awoods: are you available for an LDP question?09:25
* coblej joins09:35
* tolloid joins09:42
<awoods>acoburn: sure09:53
<acoburn>awoods: say you have an indirect container with an ldp:insertedContentRelation set to some property09:54
awoods: and a contained resource has several triples with that predicate
awoods: it is therefore my understanding that the membership resource would have multiple member triples from a single resource contained by the indirect container09:55
awoods: does that make sense?
awoods: I am pretty sure that's how Fedora behaves; I just want to make sure I understand it correctly
awoods: as a concrete example, you have an indirect container w/ <> ldp:insertedContentRelation dc:subject09:56
<awoods>acoburn: I assume you have consulted the LDP spec? My recollection is that multiple values for the insertedContentRelation triple would be indeterminate.09:57
acoburn: I understand the scenario
<acoburn>awoods: and that ldp-c contains a single resource with five <> dc:subject <uri> triples
awoods: yes, I have read the spec
<awoods>acoburn: and the spec does not call out that scenario, right?
<acoburn>awoods: I'll re-verify…09:58
<awoods>5.5.1.2 LDP does not define the behavior when more than one triple containing the predicate P is present in the client's input09:59
<acoburn>awoods: I just got to that section
awoods: so it seems that behavior is up to the implementation10:01
<awoods>acoburn: so we have the option of making the behavior specified, or remaining silent
<acoburn>awoods: do you have a preference?10:02
<awoods>acoburn: my preference would be to specify... one way or the other, with an eye two interop of implementations.10:03
s/two/towards/
* osmandin joins10:05
<acoburn>awoods: I can add an issue in the spec github
awoods: i.e. to discuss this
<awoods>acoburn++
* coblej leaves10:10
<acoburn>awoods: the next question is whether Fedora currently handles the triple: <> ldp:insertedContentRelation ldp:MemberSubject correctly10:18
<awoods>acoburn: I would have to look10:19
<acoburn>awoods: I'm trying it now, but it takes me a little while to build up the container properties10:20
<awoods>acoburn: these are helpful: https://gist.github.com/escowles/43e434979c9fd3762cb1ad1225655abf10:21
<acoburn>awoods: yes, it appears to work correctly10:26
<awoods>acoburn: thanks for checking
* coblej joins10:27
* kestlund joins10:41
* whikloj joins10:49
* tolloid leaves10:58
* mcritchlow joins11:08
* mcritchlow leaves
* th5 joins11:10
* mcritchlow joins11:12
* kefo joins11:24
* coblej leaves11:41
* bseeger leaves12:01
* osmandin leaves12:27
* coblej joins12:29
* bseeger joins12:45
* kestlund leaves13:02
* kestlund joins13:29
* coblej leaves13:31
* escowles joins13:36
* coblej joins13:41
* kestlund leaves
* kestlund1 joins
* kestlund1 leaves13:57
* acoburn leaves14:41
* escowles leaves15:12
* github-ff joins15:18
[fcrepo4] emetsger opened pull request #1184: Proposed fix for FCREPO-2341 (master...link-header-parsing) https://git.io/vSemT
* github-ff leaves
* coblej leaves15:21
* coblej joins15:39
* ejbivona joins16:07
* bseeger leaves16:47
* ejbivona leaves16:48
* mcritchlow leaves16:53
* mcritchlow joins
* mcritchlow leaves16:58
* coblej leaves17:13
* th5 leaves17:25
* ejbivona joins17:34
* ejbivona leaves17:48
* escowles joins17:54
* escowles leaves17:59
* whikloj leaves18:01
* kefo leaves18:24
* manez leaves19:30
* dhlamb leaves19:31
* manez joins
* mcritchlow joins21:03
* escowles joins21:37
* pdurbin leaves21:41
* mcritchlow leaves23:31
* f4jenkins leaves00:02
* f4jenkins joins

Generated by Sualtam