Log of the #fcrepo channel on chat.freenode.net

Using timezone: Eastern Standard Time
* mjgiarlo leaves01:29
* mjgiarlo joins02:16
* mjgiarlo leaves02:25
* mjgiarlo joins02:39
* thomz joins02:43
* cmills leaves03:30
* cmills joins
* dhlamb leaves04:29
* manez joins08:00
* manez leaves08:04
* dchandekstark joins08:32
* coblej joins08:34
* manez joins08:36
* dhlamb joins08:50
* whikloj joins08:54
* apb18 joins08:58
* esm_ joins09:07
* ajs6f joins09:09
awoods: I missed yesterday's meeting (obviously). Is anyone going to follow up with LDPNext re: the timestamp granularity thing? tjohnson and I agreed ysterday that if no one is, I will.09:20
* thomz leaves09:23
* ajs6f leaves09:27
<apb18>ajs6f: I don't recall anybody taking that on; just that it was something that should be brought up with LDPNext.09:29
* ajs6f joins09:38
<awoods>ajs6f: I added the ETag topic to the next LDP-Next call agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldpnext/2016Aug/0006.html
<ajs6f>awoods: I know, but we don't even have a date for that call (which will, it seems, include us and Cody B. and no one else), and we already know that we're going to need to talk about If-Not-Modified as well. Is it worth starting a separrate thread, or do you want to just pack up one discussion?09:42
Wait, If-Modified-Since. Or whatever it is.09:43
<awoods>ajs6f: I think tjohnson's original thread is the right one. Feel free to mention the concern of If-Unmodified-Since's second granularity if you think that would be helpful.09:45
<ajs6f>awoods: I dunno. I think we need to follow up oon the basic question: how do we publish errata? Otherwise it's just this same conversation with the same people in a diff venue.09:46
<awoods>ajs6f: That is a good point about publishing errata. Since we are LDP-Next, we should see what existing W3C practices are, and do the same.09:48
* bseeger joins09:49
* yinlin joins
* yinlin leaves09:50
* peichman joins09:51
<ajs6f>awoods: Practices vary. But as a community group, we can publish our own docs on orur own account. You can do that, as a chair.09:52
<awoods>ajs6f: if you have some such examples on hand, I would be glad to pull together the start of our own LDP errata doc.09:53
<ajs6f>awoods: Examples of community groups publishing docs?09:54
<awoods>ajs6f: yes, specifically spec errata docs
* dwilcox joins09:58
<ajs6f>awoods: We don't need an example. If you really want to trace this out, SPARQL Maintenance (EXISTS) is an example of a whole group that exists only to correct one problem with a spec. JSON-LD was actually published from a comm group, not a working group: https://www.w3.org/community/json-ld/
awoods: R Sanderson and tjohson have specifically warned that there may be no process available. We may have to make our own.09:59
<awoods>ajs6f: that is all good to know. Thanks.10:00
<ajs6f>awoods: This is more and mroe appearing to me to be a case of the person who keeps asking "Who's in charge?" is going to have to take charge.
* coblej leaves10:24
* dchandekstark leaves10:26
* dchandekstark joins10:39
* coblej joins10:45
* dwilcox leaves11:11
* bseeger leaves11:30
* coblej leaves11:57
* bseeger joins12:03
* dhlamb leaves12:04
* ajs6f leaves12:05
* ajs6f joins12:15
* dchandekstark leaves12:16
* dchandekstark joins
* dchandekstark leaves12:17
* dchandekstark joins12:23
* ajs6f leaves12:41
* acoburn joins12:44
<awoods>whikloj: do you mind if I give this one a look: https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-184212:54
<whikloj>awoods: absolutely, after I finished FCREPO-2075 I haven't come around to that one12:55
<awoods>whikloj: ok, I will keep you posted on progress12:56
<whikloj>awoods: thanks
* coblej joins12:58
* coblej leaves12:59
* coblej joins
* peichman leaves13:10
* peichman joins13:12
* esm_ leaves13:23
* escowles leaves13:38
* escowles joins13:39
* bseeger leaves13:58
* SZxd leaves13:59
* bseeger joins14:03
* ajs6f joins14:04
* esm_ joins14:26
* ajs6f leaves14:56
* dhlamb joins15:06
* dchandekstark leaves15:14
* dchandekstark joins15:20
* peichman leaves
* peichman joins15:33
* dchandekstark leaves
* manez leaves15:44
* escowles leaves15:52
* manez joins16:00
* anarchivist leaves16:01
* esm_ leaves16:19
* dchandekstark joins16:30
* anarchivist joins16:34
* coblej leaves16:50
* whikloj leaves17:01
* apb18 leaves17:09
* bseeger leaves17:15
* peichman leaves17:21
* dhlamb leaves17:25
* acoburn leaves17:30
* peichman joins17:42
* esm_ joins17:49
* dchandekstark leaves
* esm_ leaves17:55
* peichman leaves18:07
* dwilcox joins18:27
* manez leaves18:33
* manez joins
* manez leaves
* dwilcox leaves18:44
* apb18 joins18:45
* dchandekstark joins18:50
* dchandekstark leaves18:55
* apb18 leaves19:34
* anarchivist leaves19:46
* github-ff joins20:37
[fcrepo4] awoods opened pull request #1094: Remove deprecated checksum query param (master...fcrepo-1851) https://git.io/v6pJ3
* github-ff leaves
* dchandekstark joins20:53
* dchandekstark leaves20:58
* anarchivist joins21:18
* dchandekstark joins22:55
* dchandekstark leaves23:00
* peichman joins
* peichman1 joins
* f4jenkins joins23:12
* peichman1 leaves23:44

Generated by Sualtam