Log of the #fcrepo channel on chat.freenode.net

Using timezone: Eastern Standard Time
* dhlamb joins05:24
* dhlamb leaves05:28
* awead leaves06:35
* awead joins06:39
* dwilcox joins07:08
* dhlamb joins07:25
* dhlamb leaves07:30
* dwilcox leaves08:18
* dwilcox joins08:38
* dwilcox leaves08:40
* dhlamb joins08:43
* dwilcox joins08:57
* jrgriffiniii joins09:06
* peichman joins09:59
* whikloj joins10:34
* bseeger joins10:50
<18WAA9FDV>Yippee, build fixed!10:52
Project fcrepo4-T2 build #431: FIXED in 4 min 16 sec: http://jenkins.fcrepo.org/job/fcrepo4-T2/431/
awoods: Add creating version snapshot in the HTML UI
* bseeger leaves11:08
* bseeger joins11:10
* bseeger leaves11:16
* travis-ci joins12:07
ualbertalib/fcrepo4-oaiprovider#22 (oai_etdms - e146b0f : Piyapong Charoenwattana): The build passed.
Change view : https://github.com/ualbertalib/fcrepo4-oaiprovider/compare/1ef3553bf410...e146b0fd50c6
Build details : https://travis-ci.org/ualbertalib/fcrepo4-oaiprovider/builds/94204455
* travis-ci leaves
* github-ff joins12:32
[fcrepo4] Rarian opened pull request #960: Update REST API for specifying checksums (master...FCREPO-1468) http://git.io/vBjgm
* github-ff leaves
* dwilcox leaves12:49
* peichman leaves13:04
<ajwagner>As a general question around additional commits to PRs, is it preferred to lump then into a single additional commit? Or is it okay to address similar comments in individual commits?13:07
(Different communities seem to have different preferences.)13:10
<whikloj>ajwagner: I won't speak for awoods, but I general address them in a single commit if I can and multiple if I need. They can (and usually are) squashed if necessary.13:13
<ajwagner>Thanks Jared.13:14
<whikloj>that may have been the worst two sentences I have ever written
ajwagner: np
<awoods>on a call13:20
* dhlamb leaves13:58
* dhlamb joins14:00
* dhlamb leaves
* dwilcox joins14:02
* dhlamb joins14:07
* bseeger joins14:35
<awoods>ajwagner: after your initial PR commit(s) all subsequent updates must come in new commits (no force pushes)14:44
ajwagner: however, feel free to address comments in individual commits or collectively.14:45
<ajwagner>awoods: Thanks for clarification, I'll continue to follow my standard commit practice then.14:46
* escowles joins
* dwilcox leaves15:21
* escowles leaves15:46
* escowles joins15:47
* escowles leaves15:51
* dwilcox joins15:56
* dhlamb leaves15:58
* escowles joins16:02
* jrgriffiniii leaves16:04
* jrgriffiniii joins16:07
* dwilcox leaves16:30
* escowles leaves16:37
* escowles joins16:38
* escowles leaves16:43
* peichman joins16:47
* dwilcox joins16:57
* whikloj_AFK leaves17:01
* escowles joins17:06
* escowles leaves17:11
* bseeger leaves17:14
* escowles joins17:15
* jrgriffiniii leaves17:23
* peichman leaves17:34
* escowles leaves17:45
* escowles joins17:46
* escowles leaves17:50
* peichman joins17:59
* peichman leaves18:03
* dhlamb joins20:39
* dhlamb leaves21:27
* dhlamb joins21:28
* dhlamb leaves21:37
* dhlamb joins21:38
* escowles joins22:46
* escowles leaves22:51
* dhlamb leaves23:09
* dwilcox leaves23:15