Log of the #duraspace-ff channel on chat.freenode.net

Using timezone: Eastern Standard Time
* scossu joins01:25
* scossu leaves01:29
* ksclarke leaves02:20
* jgpawletko joins06:42
* dwilcox joins08:16
* dhlamb joins08:25
* awead joins08:46
* mikeAtUVa joins08:56
* mikeAtUVa leaves09:03
* mikeAtUVa joins09:08
* github-ff joins09:20
[ontology] acoburn opened pull request #18: removed unused DublinCoreDescribable and Fixity-related classes (master...fcrepo-1343) http://git.io/bqb209:21
* github-ff leaves
* ksclarke joins09:22
* jgpawletko leaves10:09
* jgpawletko joins10:15
* dwilcox leaves10:29
* ajs6f joins10:46
<awoods>where do things stand with the vocabularies conversation from the list?10:52
ajs6f: re:vocabularies, was your latest suggestion directly related to any of the proposals on the table?10:53
* acoburn joins
<ajs6f>awoods: No, it was to the point most important to me, that the versioning of org.fcrepo modules and the versioning of ontologies/API specs/TCK packages _must_ be independent.10:54
awoods: The syntax is less important to me, although I have a vague preference for plain numbers over dates.
<awoods>ajs6f: agreed. I would think that if vocabulary versions shared numbers that happened to be the same as f4 release versions, that may convolute your principle.10:56
<acoburn>ajs6f: I completely agree on the point about independence between the ontology and the fcrepo version
ajs6f: FWIW, I suggested the date-based scheme in order to suggest greater separation between the ontology version and fcrepo version10:57
<ajs6f>awoods: That sounds like what escowles was saying, and if both of you perceive that potential confusion, then let's do something else.
awoods/acoburn: Dates could work, or independent version-numbering, or a counter.10:58
<f4jenkins>Project fcrepo4-T2 build #135: UNSTABLE in 9 min 55 sec: http://jenkins.fcrepo.org/job/fcrepo4-T2/135/
<awoods>ajs6f: did you happen to see the proposal on the table in the email thread?
<ajs6f>awoods: That was the 4.x.0-style proposal, no?
<awoods>ajs6f: I do not think so. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/fedora-tech/vsiKkdP2dLc/3JaJKLo2Gk8J10:59
<ajs6f>awoods: Weird. I didn't get that.11:00
awoods: Anyway, that looks fine to me. One question: how do we migrate to hat?
that
<awoods>ajs6f: that is weird
ajs6f: migrate?11:01
<ajs6f>from the current URI.
<awoods>ajs6f: the code would not need to change
<ajs6f>are we using "http://fedora.info/definitions/v4/repository#" now?
<awoods>ajs6f: yes
<ajs6f>okay, cool.
<awoods>acoburn/escowles: did you get the above linked email?11:02
<acoburn>awoods: I received it
<awoods>ajs6f: if you are ok with the suggestion, would you be generous enough to offer a +1 to the thread?11:03
<ajs6f>awoods: Perhaps. I'll offer you a +0.5 with an interest rate of 3%. In a few years, that should add up to +1.11:04
<awoods>ajs6f: never simple11:05
* dwilcox joins11:08
* ajs6f1 joins11:10
* ajs6f leaves
* scossu joins11:11
* acoburn leaves11:17
<terrellt>So when I do a full reindex of FC3 via ActiveFedora eventually I get this: https://gist.github.com/terrellt/1a35b0d94de59ff8e82311:18
Is there a way to increase the valid time for a session?
Eh, I suppose I can just store the IDs in memory and then rebuild the digital objects11:19
Or just not use blocks for this bit.11:20
So, nevermind!
* ajs6f1 leaves11:50
* ajs6f joins11:54
* awoods leaves12:34
* awoods joins12:36
ajs6f: can you please give the a quick review, and if there are no comments, commit it to master? https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-134713:14
ajs6f: can you please give this a quick review, and if there are no comments, commit it to master? https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-1347
<ajs6f>awoods: Yes, but later this afternoon, okay?13:15
<awoods>ajs6f: anytime. thanks.
<ajs6f>awoods: Oh, this is just the capitalization thing? I can do that now.
<awoods>ajs6f: it is trivial
<ajs6f>awoods: Urg— I don't have access to merge.13:16
<awoods>ajs6f: one moment
ajs6f: now try13:17
* github-ff joins
[fcrepo4-release-tests] ajs6f closed pull request #5: Minor updates of license and 'Indexable' predicate (master...fcrepo-1347) http://git.io/bkl5
* github-ff leaves
<ajs6f>awoods: Should I close the ticket? I assume so...13:18
<awoods>ajs6f: yes, please
<ajs6f>We need to update those "Roadmap Themes".13:19
<awoods>ajs6f: if you have an initial candidate list, I can make sure they get into jira.
<ajs6f>"Stuff", "Nonsense", "Couldn't Be Bothered", and "Trivialities".13:20
* travis-ci joins13:25
fcrepo4-labs/fcrepo4-release-tests#17 (master - 4282428 : ajs6f): The build passed.
Change view : https://github.com/fcrepo4-labs/fcrepo4-release-tests/compare/d9d8214cc31e...4282428cf188
Build details : http://travis-ci.org/fcrepo4-labs/fcrepo4-release-tests/builds/49351643
* travis-ci leaves
* scossu leaves13:38
* github-ff joins13:58
[ontology] awoods pushed 1 new commit to master: http://git.io/bOw9
ontology/master c8c1aca Aaron Coburn: Remove unused classes and properties:...
* github-ff leaves
* github-ff joins14:00
[ontology] awoods closed pull request #18: removed unused DublinCoreDescribable and Fixity-related classes (master...fcrepo-1343) http://git.io/bqb2
* github-ff leaves
<awoods>Team: I am anticipating a 4.1.0 release tomorrow. Besides publishing the vocabularies, I do not see any blockers: https://jira.duraspace.org/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=2114:02
Team: Is there anything else that the release should be waiting for?14:03
* scossu joins14:08
<f4jenkins>Yippee, build fixed!14:15
Project fcrepo4-release-tests build #97: FIXED in 1 min 32 sec: http://jenkins.fcrepo.org/job/fcrepo4-release-tests/97/
* scossu leaves14:17
<mikeAtUVa>awoods: if when I have a first draft of a coding start to the fedora 3 to 4 migration effort should I put it in fcrepo-labs, or just throw it up in my github account until we get more buy-in.14:32
<awoods>mikeAtUVa: may as well go straight to fcrepo-labs14:33
<mikeAtUVa>awoods: works for me... thanks.
* yinlin joins14:47
awoods: please check email
<awoods>yinlin: ok14:49
* scossu joins14:54
<ajs6f>awoods: Is the filesystem connector supposed to work for Read and Write?14:55
<awoods>ajs6f: no, it is read-only14:56
<ajs6f>awwods: That's what I thought, but we have ITs that appear to be testing write. They're failing, and I'm inclined to not worry about them for this Java 8 thing.
<awoods>ajs6f: that is odd... which tests?14:57
<ajs6f>org.fcrepo.integration.connector.file.BasicReadWriteFedoraFileSystemConnectorIT.testWriteProperty()
org.fcrepo.integration.connector.file.BasicReadWriteFedoraFileSystemConnectorIT.testRemoveProperty()
<awoods>ajs6f: it looks like those tests are expecting an exception to be thrown.14:58
<ajs6f>awooods: Sure, fine. My question is whether it's worth my time to debug them, when they're testing unsupported functinality.14:59
<awoods>ajs6f: The tests should continue to work, since they work now.15:00
<ajs6f>awoods: Sigh.
<awoods>ajs6f: but it is not a top priority, for what you are doing at present.15:01
<ajs6f>awoods: I'm not messing with them, because I don't even understand how they are supposed to work. They expect exceptions, but they also contain multiple assertions after the points at which any exceptions could be thrown.15:02
<awoods>on a call
<ajs6f>Iawoods: I'm going to @Ignore them and move on.
<yinlin>awoods: will this help for my test case? https://github.com/fcrepo4/fcrepo4/blob/21572a273c9d94ed7e0e6811e4553ac99245264e/fcrepo-transform/src/test/java/org/fcrepo/integration/LDPathServiceIT.java15:22
<awoods>on a call
yinlin: It looks like the issue you are running into relates to constructing and testing triples.15:51
* dwilcox leaves15:54
* github-ff joins16:12
[fcrepo4] yinlinchen opened pull request #706: Fcrepo 1290 (master...fcrepo-1290) http://git.io/b3Sz
* github-ff leaves
* dhlamb leaves16:16
* ajs6f1 joins16:19
* ajs6f leaves16:20
* ajs6f joins16:23
* ajs6f1 leaves
* github-ff joins16:27
[fcrepo4] ajs6f pushed 2 new commits to Java8: http://git.io/b3FD
fcrepo4/Java8 446f0f9 ajs6f: Using delegation to Stream in RdfStream
fcrepo4/Java8 91d20d3 ajs6f: Propagating new Stream type out from RdfStream
* github-ff leaves
<ajs6f>awoods: This Java 8 thing is (not surprisingly) touching all kinds of stuff. When it comes time to look at it, we'll want several reviewers.
<awoods>ajs6f: please also do your best not to include format updates.16:28
<ajs6f>awoods: That's almost meaningless, because all of the guts of the classes are gone, replaced with lots of ->
<awoods>ajs6f: great
<ajs6f>-> +
Can we give karma to operators?16:29
It's really nice to see all that Function<T,R> foo = new Function<T,R>(){ public R apply(T thing… stuff melt away.16:30
* github-ff joins16:35
[fcrepo4] yinlinchen opened pull request #707: override hashcode() (master...fcrepo-fix) http://git.io/b3xW
* github-ff leaves
<yinlin>awoods: please check this PR https://github.com/fcrepo4/fcrepo4/pull/70716:36
* travis-ci joins16:37
fcrepo4/fcrepo4#3339 (Java8 - 91d20d3 : ajs6f): The build has errored.
Change view : https://github.com/fcrepo4/fcrepo4/compare/8439fc2d1a80...91d20d3fa184
Build details : http://travis-ci.org/fcrepo4/fcrepo4/builds/49373963
* travis-ci leaves
* mikeAtUVa leaves16:46
<f4jenkins>Yippee, build fixed!17:01
Project fcrepo-message-consumer build #999: FIXED in 8 min 53 sec: http://jenkins.fcrepo.org/job/fcrepo-message-consumer/999/
Project fcrepo4-release-tests build #98: UNSTABLE in 2 min 13 sec: http://jenkins.fcrepo.org/job/fcrepo4-release-tests/98/17:04
* ajs6f leaves17:10
* dhlamb joins17:13
* ajs6f joins17:15
* ajs6f leaves
* dhlamb leaves17:18
* scossu leaves17:35
* dhlamb joins17:47
* dhlamb leaves17:51
* ksclarke leaves18:44
* dhlamb joins18:47
* dhlamb leaves18:52
* ksclarke joins19:02
* dhlamb joins19:48
* dhlamb leaves19:53
* scossu joins20:00
* scossu leaves
* dwilcox joins20:36
* dwilcox leaves20:39
* dhlamb joins20:44
* scossu joins21:11
* scossu leaves21:15
* dhlamb leaves22:13
* scossu joins22:22
* awead leaves22:32
* scossu leaves22:35
* ksclarke leaves23:09
* scossu joins

Generated by Sualtam